But what guarantees does Nokia have, that Stephen is Elopin but not a "Belluzo", a mole later to be found working for Microsofts benefit? From the Nokia point of view, this risk should be underlined in the financial rewards Elopin will get while working and after working at Nokia. Maybe this is not an issue, as Elopin has worked for other companies too, such as Juniper Networks, Adobe Systems and Macromedia until he joined Microsoft. But do remember, that if there has not been any current danger, that does not mean there would be no danger later. That's why the Nokia risk management should take this into account, especially in the long run. As a leader. Stephen seems to fill the bill in therms of the Nokia spirit; reportedly he has "big ears" and good charisma, combined with modesty. Personally I'm anxious to see what happens, when he puts the puck on the ice both here on the Nokia country Finland and across the Atlantic!





















Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti